About AZ Disruptors

AZ Disruptors is a startup incubator for software companies.

For the latest Arizona Startups and Arizona Tech News, visit AZTechBeat.com.

Subscribe to News

RSS Feed Follow AZ Disruptors on TwitterTwitter

Or you can subscribe by email.


You will get a confirmation email.



Entries in AT&T (2)


JAWA's Defense, Employees and Intimidation

I'm amazed that to this day, I still haven't seen a single journalist in Arizona write about the JAWA lawsuit and the incredibly lucrative, large text message scams.

AZ Disruptors is a site about software startups in Arizona, not about covering scams, but in the absence of the Arizona Republic and the Phoenix Business Journal actually doing some investigative reporting, I'm picking up their slack. I'm not sure why they're not covering this -- I've been in contact with virtually every local news vendor in the valley.

Anyway, yesterday, JAWA filed their counterclaim to Verizon's suit. It's quite a fun read. Lets break it down, shall we:

This is absolutely awesome and incredible insight. First, JAWA seems to be arguing that because they have 240 employees, somehow, the judge should consider that as part of their argument.

That's like Enron arguing "we have 30,000 employees at Enron..."

Then it gets better. In fact, it gets really good. They assert that they have been doing business with Verizon for 4 years and Verizon's share of the revenues (30% in this case) has been worth $30 Million since 2008. WOW! That means JAWA's share of the revenues JUST FROM VERIZON for the past 2 years has been over $70 Million!

That's worth repeating. $70 Million in revenues just from 1 of the 4 major cell phone carriers.

I know it seems impossible, but it gets even better! In another part of the counterclaim, JAWA claims:


In this part, they claim that the aggregators are withholding approximately $19 Million from JAWA. This is money the cell phone companies have already billed customers, but have not yet paid to JAWA. However, the aggregators apparently don't pay the content providers (Jawa, etc.) for approximately 90 days after the service is provided.

This is probably why AT&T was willing to give me back a 3 month refund -- but not more -- without a bigger fight. If that is in fact the case, the $19 million being withheld from JAWA's represents revenue for the past 90 days. At a $19 Million per 90-day run-rate, that puts JAWA's revenues at approximately $76 Million per year (assuming no growth) from the US alone.

But, that might be a low estimate, because in another part of the JAWA Counterclaim, JAWA indicates that "JAWA's revenues generated by customers of Verizon approximated $75 Million during the past twelve months."

I know what you're thinking. You're thinking it can't get better than that, right? Just wait, there's more! JAWA also claims, "Verizon has willingly accepted and retained the profits over the last four years from what it now describes as a 'criminal enterprise' even though, during this time, it audited these practices."

Wow! That sounds a lot like JAWA is saying Verizon is our partner in crime Premium SMS Services and we don't understand why they've turned against us, all of a sudden. This very well might be true. And, it may be possible that Verizon's change of heart was initiated by Texas Attorney General, Greg Abbott. If that's the case, Kudos to him!

JAWA's defense begs the question: Do the wireless companies knowingly allow these scams to continue?

Where Are JAWA's Employees in All This?

One might think that if JAWA is doing something wrong, with more than 240 employees, there would be at least one whistle blower, right? This is where things get interesting. Remember Enron? They had more than 30,000 employees. Bernie Madoff had a $50 Billion Ponzie scheme with hundreds of employees.

Often times, employees of such companies don't get to see the big picture. They get sucked into it or have personal reasons for staying quiet (think mortgages, children, and other responsibilities). They might also be worried or intimidated by their seemingly powerful employers who are often well-connected with politicians.

In JAWA's case, at least one employee is sticking up for them. Earlier today, I had the following comment posted on my blog by a person identifying themselves as "me":

"me" seems to be a really brave guy and a dedicated employee. He's also got an interesting name. But what I don't understand is this: If JAWA is a legitimate business why is "me" so concerned? His or her comment "...and if the ship goes down I will proudly go down with it" doesn't seem like something one would say about an honest company. Ships don't just go down without a reason.  Maybe the commenter knows that there are good reasons for this ship to go down.

Could Employees be Intimidated?

For the first time ever, my company Axosoft, has become the victim of intimidation techniques. Just this morning, Axosoft's Wikipedia page was vandalized. Take a look:

The link that was added to the Axosoft Wikipedia page goes to a Maricopa Superior Court page listing all the law suits that I've been a party to. I'm not certain who was behind the vandalized site, nor what their purpose was. Perhaps it is to tell me "hey, we're watching you!" Or is it to intimidate me?

Who is it from? It turns out the edits were done from an IP address related to a hosting provider known as http://www.defconservers.com, which itself looks like a shady hosting provider. Try calling their toll-free number: 1-800-998-3108. It could have been any of their customers who made the change. Or some hacker. But the timing is odd, wouldn't you say?

Intimidation doesn't work with me. It only lights the fire in my belly. But it goes to show that if someone is in fact trying to intimidate me -- and I hardly know anything about this case -- I can only imagine what the employees of a company that might be involved with fraud must endure. 

Here's the thing: if you let others intimidate and stop you from doing the right thing, then what does that say about your character? Only YOU get to define who you are.

If you know any information about this, you can email me directly. My email is hamids at axosoft - do it from an anonymous email, if needed. Don't let anyone intimidate you and stop you from doing what you know is right.


WOW! I'm Victim of the Text Messaging Scams!

After writing two articles on the scumbags who run text message fraud schemes, it occurred to me that I never check my AT&T phone bill - what if I'm one of the people that Jason Hope and his elaborate text messaging scams is affecting?

So I decided to check my online bills. checking my latest bill, sure-enough, I found a subscription charge of $9.99: 

It's worth noting that above information is at the VERY BOTTOM OF MY 38 PAGE BILL! I was blown away. Here I am feeling sorry for the millions of people who are falling for these scams and not noticing the charges on their bill and it turns out, I'm one of the suckers!

How far back did this go? I checked every one of my online bills all the way back to January of 2010. The subscription charge by these scumbags started on my May 2010 billing cycle:

$9.99 each month for May, June, July, August, September, August, November, December, January (2011) and February. A total of $99.90 of charges that had gone unnoticed on MY BILLS! Unbelievable.

I got on the phone with AT&T and as I write this article, I've been on the phone with them for a total of 1 hour and 29 minutes. I'm currently on hold. Here is how my interactions with AT&T went: 

  • Michael, the first Customer Service Rep has been a victim of these scams himself. He sounded like a young guy in his 20s. He started explaining that "I agree it's a scam" but then he started to blame himself for when he was scammed saying "I must have signed up for it when I applied for some scholarships and I didn't read the fine print." I was blown away. Michael seemed to blame himself for the scam! I couldn't believe what I was hearing. He went ahead and refunded 2 months of charges for me, but he also said that they couldn't go beyond 3 months. I then asked what we need to do to stop this company from charging anybody else - ever! He said there was nothing they could do. I asked if they have a fraud department and they do. Michael transferred me to the fraud department.
  • Cory in the Fraud department, whom I must have just woken up, explained to me that there was nothing he could do about text messaging fraud. His fraud department was to address issues that was about falsely created cell phone accounts, not fraudulent text messages. He then proceeded to transfer me back to customer service because he said "if customer service can't help you, nobody can!"
  • This time around, I got a more sympathetic young girl, Angelique, in customer service. She loved the fact that I was trying to stop this scam from affecting all of AT&T's customers. In fact, she proceeded to refund me all 10 months worth of charges. She did inform me that there was not much she could do about stopping the scams, but after some encouragement from me that "if we don't stop it, who will?" she agreed to explain the situation to her boss and see where it would go.
  • Rebecca was Anjelique's boss. She was not on board with our plans. She explained to me that they were "already investigating this," which turned out to be a bunch of BS as it was later confirmed by Rebecca's boss. There is no investigation that my complaints (or anybody else's for that matter) has triggered. After several minutes of Rebecca explaining to me that it's out of her hands, she agreed to transfer me to her boss.
  • Jennifer was Rebecca's boss. She was determined to be my last stop. She put her foot down that there is nothing AT&T can do about such fraudulent charges, except to credit them back to customers who complain. Really? Really! My conversation with her was very informative and she claimed that AT&T does not make a single cent on any of the text message charges (update: I have confirmed through my own sources that claim is 100% false - the wireless companies can get up to 50% of the fees charged through text messages). That is completely bogus. The conversation is definitely worth listening to (Listen below). She also claims that AT&T has no way to stop text messages coming from known scammers (update: I have confirmed that too is bogus - in fact, the Mobile Messaging Association created just for that purpose).

The reason my call with AT&T took more than 90 minutes is because I was trying to stop "Textea", the "content provider" that had been charging me $9.99 for 10 months, from being able to continue to operate and charge other AT&T customers. That proved to be an insurmountable challenge.

I cut the full recording of my conversations with AT&T to just a few minutes with the last person in line, Jennifer. Remember, this is after they had already credited me for the charges. They no longer wanted to have anything to do with me. My exchange with Jennifer from AT&T will go down as one of the highlights of this investigation:

It's pretty incredible. I'm reminded, despite what Jennifer claims, AT&T makes hundreds of millions of dollars from the pass-through of such scam charges. So what is their incentive to stop the crooks? They have none. Just the opposite, in fact. They have incentive to let the scams continue and turn a blind eye.

I decided to investigate "Textea", the supposed "Content Provider" that has been charging me $9.99 for 10 months. AT&T could not provide me with any contact information for this content provider. Fantastic! Some Google searches revealed the web site http://www.textea.com. The site, which is in Spanish, provides a 1-877-889-1506 phone number to call. The automated system IS IN SPANISH! Are you kidding me? Pressing 2 gets me an English prompt and of course, there is no way to reach a human operator. When you choose the option to stop their subscription, the prompt switches back to Spanish. Nice! Nobody can stop these guys? Seriously? We just have to put up with this crap?

I can't help but wonder if Jason Hope and the network of companies that he has created to scam people are also behind Textea.com and I didn't even get an invite to his $500,000 party that I helped pay for. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to investigate these matters without the cooperation of the wireless phone companies.